The same two platforms serve very different jobs. Find the one that matches where your risk is today — and what you are trying to prove to whom.
AppSecD runs SAST, DAST, SCA, secret detection, IaC, container, Kubernetes and API security against a single finding model, so the same vulnerability is deduplicated once and tracked once — not re-reported across three separate tools. Reachability analysis narrows a long raw list to the findings that are actually callable.
AppSecD connects to GitHub and GitLab over scoped tokens, gates pull requests and commits by policy, and surfaces results inside the developer's editor — VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf and JetBrains — so the fix happens while the author still has the context. It is API-first and webhook-driven for automation.
Run Maphra for continuous external attack surface visibility and AppSecD for application posture, and report from the same evidence rather than re-keyed spreadsheets. A maker-checker lifecycle means a finding cannot be closed unilaterally. Compliance frameworks are evidenced honestly — frameworks you report against, not certifications we claim to hold.
If you cannot confidently list everything you expose to the internet, start with Maphra. It works from the outside in: no agent, no credential into your estate, no network access. A first assessment needs only a domain, and active validation is scope-gated to assets you confirm as yours.